August 2013 Monthly Roundup
Suits by Suits did not go into recess in August, but stayed on top of the latest developments in the courts affecting companies and high-level employees when their relationships sour, including in these posts:
- You’re “Not That Pretty”, Part 1
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 29, 2013 - You’re “Not That Pretty,” Part 2 – You’re Old, Too
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 29, 2013 - Even When “Loss” Is Defined, Insurance Policy Interpretation For Executive Agreement Claims Can Still Be Tricky
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 27, 2013 - Paula Deen Ruling Also Reminds Us: Title VII Protects Employees Who Are Discriminated Against for Their Association with People of Other Races Outside of the Workplace
Ellen D. Marcus | August 22, 2013 - Paula Deen Ruling Reminds Us: Title VII Protects White Employees Who Are Discriminated Against for Their Association with Black Employees
Ellen D. Marcus | August 20, 2013 - “Hell or High Water” or Fraud: Court Rules That Supermarket Scion Was Entitled To Post-Termination Benefits Despite Misconduct
Jason M. Knott | August 14, 2013 - Lawson v. FMR LLC: A Close Look at the Whistleblowers’ Opening Salvo in the Supreme Court
Jason M. Knott | August 12, 2013 - Noncompetes in Missouri: An In-Depth Look at the Larry Conners Case
P. Andrew Torrez | August 7, 2013 - State-By-State Smackdown XLVIII
P. Andrew Torrez | August 5, 2013 - The “Borgata Babes” Case: Is an Employer’s Weight Requirement for Casino Waitresses Gender Discrimination or a “Reasonable Appearance Standard?” Part 1
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 1, 2013 - The “Borgata Babes” Case: Is an Employer’s Weight Requirement for Casino Waitresses Gender Discrimination or an Agreed-To “Reasonable Appearance Standard?” Part 2
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 1, 2013