August 2013 Monthly Roundup
Suits by Suits did not go into recess in August, but stayed on top of the latest developments in the courts affecting companies and high-level employees when their relationships sour, including in these posts:
- You’re “Not That Pretty”, Part 1
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 29, 2013 - You’re “Not That Pretty,” Part 2 – You’re Old, Too
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 29, 2013 - Even When “Loss” Is Defined, Insurance Policy Interpretation For Executive Agreement Claims Can Still Be Tricky
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 27, 2013 - Paula Deen Ruling Also Reminds Us: Title VII Protects Employees Who Are Discriminated Against for Their Association with People of Other Races Outside of the Workplace
Ellen D. Marcus | August 22, 2013 - Paula Deen Ruling Reminds Us: Title VII Protects White Employees Who Are Discriminated Against for Their Association with Black Employees
Ellen D. Marcus | August 20, 2013 - “Hell or High Water” or Fraud: Court Rules That Supermarket Scion Was Entitled To Post-Termination Benefits Despite Misconduct
Jason M. Knott | August 14, 2013 - Lawson v. FMR LLC: A Close Look at the Whistleblowers’ Opening Salvo in the Supreme Court
Jason M. Knott | August 12, 2013 - Noncompetes in Missouri: An In-Depth Look at the Larry Conners Case
P. Andrew Torrez | August 7, 2013 - State-By-State Smackdown XLVIII
P. Andrew Torrez | August 5, 2013 - The “Borgata Babes” Case: Is an Employer’s Weight Requirement for Casino Waitresses Gender Discrimination or a “Reasonable Appearance Standard?” Part 1
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 1, 2013 - The “Borgata Babes” Case: Is an Employer’s Weight Requirement for Casino Waitresses Gender Discrimination or an Agreed-To “Reasonable Appearance Standard?” Part 2
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | August 1, 2013
Information provided on InsightZS should not be considered legal advice and expressed views are those of the authors alone. Readers should seek specific legal guidance before acting in any particular circumstance.
As the regulatory and business environments in which our clients operate grow increasingly complex, we identify and offer perspectives on significant legal developments affecting businesses, organizations, and individuals. Each post aims to address timely issues and trends by evaluating impactful decisions, sharing observations of key enforcement changes, or distilling best practices drawn from experience. InsightZS also features personal interest pieces about the impact of our legal work in our communities and about associate life at Zuckerman Spaeder.
Information provided on InsightZS should not be considered legal advice and expressed views are those of the authors alone. Readers should seek specific legal guidance before acting in any particular circumstance.