General rule for the executive world, No. 292: if you're going to ask permission to have an affair with someone who works for you, be honest when you ask.

| Zuckerman Spaeder Team

Here’s an interesting story from Joann S. Lublin and Christopher Weaver of the Wall Street Journal about the CEO of medical device company Stryker, who was asked to leave that company over an alleged affair with a flight attendant who worked on the company’s private plane.  In the abstract, it’s not unusual for a well-placed executive to leave when an affair with a subordinate is discovered.  The interesting thing is: CEO Stephen MacMillan asked a committee of the company’s board for approval to conduct the affair once his divorce was final.  He (and his paramour) even followed the committee’s request that the flight attendant leave the company first. 

Then the story gets even more complicated.  The board commissioned an investigation and it turns out Mr. MacMillan’s affair with the flight attendant may have started before he even asked for permission.  So, while MacMillan was taking an unusual approach by seeking approval for the romance, his possible lack of full candor in asking for that approval meant he “lost the confidence of some directors and was forced to resign” over the whole thing. 

There’s a lesson, or more than one, in all of this.  First, the old truism that successful office romances are almost impossible remains true.  Second, (and we hope this is a rare case), if you decide to take the unusual step of seeking approval for an office romance, make sure the affair hasn’t started before you seek that permission.  

Click here to view the full story in today's Wall Street Journal (subscription required).

Information provided on InsightZS should not be considered legal advice and expressed views are those of the authors alone. Readers should seek specific legal guidance before acting in any particular circumstance.

As the regulatory and business environments in which our clients operate grow increasingly complex, we identify and offer perspectives on significant legal developments affecting businesses, organizations, and individuals. Each post aims to address timely issues and trends by evaluating impactful decisions, sharing observations of key enforcement changes, or distilling best practices drawn from experience. InsightZS also features personal interest pieces about the impact of our legal work in our communities and about associate life at Zuckerman Spaeder.

Information provided on InsightZS should not be considered legal advice and expressed views are those of the authors alone. Readers should seek specific legal guidance before acting in any particular circumstance.