March 2013 Monthly Roundup
For us here in the greater Baltimore/Washington metropolitan area, March was true to form – or at least, the Farmer’s Almanac – and came in like a lion (with city-closing snow and everything!) but has gone out like a lamb, as today is beautifully sunny with highs in the mid-60s.
As the Farmer’s Almanac tells us, that saying was rooted in the ancient belief that weather would seek a balance, and that good events would cancel out bad ones. That sense of balance held true for your Suits by Suits editors this month as well, as Ellen Marcus documented the unique ability of shareholders to protest “golden parachutes” for companies emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy – as contrasted with their general inability to do much else. Bill Schreiner explained how the average executive can protect herself from incurring certain legal expenses through directors & officers’ (“D&O”) insurance policies, while noting the limits of those D&O policies especially in high-profile cases like former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky. Andrew Torrez continued to document the push-and-pull in the legislative arena over whether and to what extent courts should uphold covenants not to compete contained in employment contracts, and warned Gov. Deval Patrick that the proposed new law in Massachusetts may not do what he expects it to do. And Jason Knott warned us that only 2% of Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowers succeed on their claims, while walking us through a comprehensive recent decision by the Second Circuit that maps out how future whistleblowers can prove the elements necessary to assert their cases.
A full list of all of our articles from March follows. And remember, Suits by Suits is now on Twitter – and that’s no April Fools!
- Shareholders Can Have Their Say on Executive Pay, But Not Much Else
Ellen D. Marcus | March 28, 2013 - Tom Horton's Severance is Probably in the Golden Parachute Bag if the Court Applies the Business Judgment Rule Rather than Section 503(c) of the Bankruptcy Code
Ellen D. Marcus | March 26, 2013 - How Does that Burden of Proof Work Again? The Second Circuit’s Recent Sarbanes-Oxley Decision Explains
Jason M. Knott | March 20, 2013 - You’ve Got (Unprivileged) Mail: Court Rules that Prosecutors Can Use E-mail Sent by Personal Attorney to Employee’s Work Account
Jason M. Knott | March 18, 2013 - More on Covenants Not to Compete: A Proposed Massachusetts Law Gets a Big Endorsement
P. Andrew Torrez | March 13, 2013 - The Basics: "Hacking," the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and You
P. Andrew Torrez | March 11, 2013 - Federal Court of Appeals Rejects Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower’s Challenge to Department of Labor Ruling
Jason M. Knott | March 7, 2013 - Everything Has a Limit, Jerry Sandusky Edition – Part 2
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | March 7, 2013 - Everything Has a Limit, Jerry Sandusky Edition – Part 1
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | March 7, 2013 - Wow! A $56 Million Golden Parachute for the Heinz CEO. Well, that Depends on What You Mean by "Golden Parachute."
Ellen D. Marcus | March 6, 2013 - Groupon CEO's Departure Memo: Watch What You Say, Even if You Say it Nicely
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | March 4, 2013
Information provided on InsightZS should not be considered legal advice and expressed views are those of the authors alone. Readers should seek specific legal guidance before acting in any particular circumstance.
As the regulatory and business environments in which our clients operate grow increasingly complex, we identify and offer perspectives on significant legal developments affecting businesses, organizations, and individuals. Each post aims to address timely issues and trends by evaluating impactful decisions, sharing observations of key enforcement changes, or distilling best practices drawn from experience. InsightZS also features personal interest pieces about the impact of our legal work in our communities and about associate life at Zuckerman Spaeder.
Information provided on InsightZS should not be considered legal advice and expressed views are those of the authors alone. Readers should seek specific legal guidance before acting in any particular circumstance.