June 2013 Monthly Roundup
It was the month of the Supermoon, the month Paula Deen made headlines that didn’t involve frying something in butter, and the month that a bunch of lawyers up the street from our Washington headquarters, who happen to wear black robes, did some significant stuff. But June also saw us write about some interesting developments involving say-on-pay, American Airlines’ CEO, non-competes, arbitration, and some other things—including, of course, Paula Deen:
- Paula Deen's Testimony May Also Have Some of the Ingredients for an Alter Ego Theory of Liability
Ellen D. Marcus | June 27, 2013 - Paula Deen's Testimony May Have Some of the Ingredients for a Court to Find Deen's Companies Liable for Assault and Battery
Ellen D. Marcus | June 26, 2013 - Simon Say-On-Pay Lawsuit Will Continue
Jason M. Knott | June 18, 2013 - Not-So-Special Delivery: First Circuit Rejects DHL Executive’s Bonus Verdict
Jason M. Knott | June 12, 2013 - Best Buy's Broad New Noncompete
P. Andrew Torrez | June 11, 2013 - Arbitration Clauses, State Law and Choice of Law: What May Fly for Halliburton in Texas Does Not Fly in New Mexico
Rachel F. Cotton | June 6, 2013 - American Airlines CEO Tom Horton One Step Closer to Free Lifetime Travel. Oh, and $20 Million
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | June 6, 2013 - An Offer Letter is Good, But Read the Final Employment Agreement Carefully
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | June 6, 2013 - Tenth Circuit Upholds Broad Definition of Sarbanes-Oxley Protected Activity
Jason M. Knott | June 5, 2013 - Dispute Over American Airlines CEO’s $20 Million Severance May be Coming in for a Landing
William A. Schreiner, Jr. | June 3, 2013
Information provided on InsightZS should not be considered legal advice and expressed views are those of the authors alone. Readers should seek specific legal guidance before acting in any particular circumstance.
As the regulatory and business environments in which our clients operate grow increasingly complex, we identify and offer perspectives on significant legal developments affecting businesses, organizations, and individuals. Each post aims to address timely issues and trends by evaluating impactful decisions, sharing observations of key enforcement changes, or distilling best practices drawn from experience. InsightZS also features personal interest pieces about the impact of our legal work in our communities and about associate life at Zuckerman Spaeder.
Information provided on InsightZS should not be considered legal advice and expressed views are those of the authors alone. Readers should seek specific legal guidance before acting in any particular circumstance.